Wembley FC need your help.

AFaceInTheCrowd

Active Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
244
Reaction score
59
Points
28
Location
Nottingham
Supports
Notts County
The disgraceful signed a few days back their greed knows no limits said when the FIFA scandal broke were the fa outraged by the corruption or felt left out because they couldn't get their nose as deep into the trough as everyone else.

They offered to play friendlies in Thailand in exchange for votes and offered fake jobs like the rest. Only problem was it didn't work.
 

shoddycollins

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
11,456
Reaction score
3,540
Points
113
Location
In the Paul Simpson wonderland
Supports
Carlisle United
I had a little look into this.

While true that the FA have sought protection for their own use of the Wembley trademark it seems this incident may have been blown out of proportion. The FA themselves have said very little so this is based on the writings of a lawyer who the BBC consulted as well as an article I found on a website about marketing. Hopefully these are neutral and expert opinions, and the content of the articles doesn't suggest they totally side with the FA.

Apparently Wembley FC had proactively registered their trademark in various foreign countries and their ownership of this trademark was preventing the FA using the Wembley Stadium trademark in those countries so they sought exclusive rights to said trademark. Legal experts have suggested this isn't about forcing the club to change their name or logo, but about allowing the FA to use the name overseas.

I don't know why Wembley FC would want their trademark protected overseas, but apparently their badge was intellectual property of Budweiser, designed as part of a sponsorship deal and Budweiser then granted it to Wembley FC when the deal ended. It's possible Budweiser went around trademarking it everywhere and now the club are bearing the brunt of that. But either way there seems to be no need for them to challenge the ruling. Perhaps they were hoping that the FA would buy the trademark from them instead of taking legal action, fair play to them if so, perhaps they just wanted the limelight, we know non-league owners enjoy the publicity a storm in a teapot can bring them, and being the little guy in all of this you can't really begrudge them that.

If they'd had any sense I'm sure the FA would have realised that if they went through the courts it would get into the press and end up being made to sound like they were taking punitive measures, and the best thing to do would have been to see what sort of compensation they wanted to release the trademarks.
 

That Fat Centre Half

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
4,093
Reaction score
1,037
Points
113
Location
Bournemouth
Supports
Luton Town
Yes when I read about this I did think there was almost certainly more to this than initially met they eye. Think best approach for all sides is for the FA to just stump up the funds for the trademark, although I am not sure if that would itself be an issue given surely the FA cant be seen to be giving what I would assume is fairly significant funds to a club in its own pyramid. Surely clubs in Wembley FC league would not be best pleased at that?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
16,455
Messages
1,196,276
Members
8,414
Latest member
Hudders
Stronger Security, Faster Connections with VPN at IPVanish.com!

SITE SPONSORS

W88 W88 trang chu KUBET Thailand
Fun88 12Bet Get top UK casino bonuses for British players in casinos not on GamStop
The best ₤1 minimum deposit casinos UK not on GamStop Find the best new no deposit casino get bonus and play legendary slots Best UK online casinos list 2022
No-Verification.Casino Casinos that accept PayPal Top online casinos
sure.bet
Need help with your academic papers? Customwritings offers high-quality professionals to write essays that deserve an A!
Top